From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76424 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:21:58 +0200 Message-ID: <8362swuadl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei7makon.fsf@gnu.org> <838vxuaek9.fsf@gnu.org> <877hdebm01.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <831v3ma532.fsf@gnu.org> <8739o2bjci.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83wrle8p8q.fsf@gnu.org> <87lj1t1wuz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <878vxt1b1i.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83d3n5t6wp.fsf@gnu.org> <874o8h124y.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <838vxtt2t5.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrldynp4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297027374 21720 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2011 21:22:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 21:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24772@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Feb 06 22:22:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PmC4H-00056C-Dr for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:22:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PmC3g-0000K6-2U; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:22:12 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PmC3d-0000Jt-Jo for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:22:09 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PmC3Q-0005H0-JQ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:22:09 -0600 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PmC3P-0001Fs-Ix for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:21:55 +0100 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LG700M00RLJ6500@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:21:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.171.5]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LG700L1ESOA5UH0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:21:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87wrldynp4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76424 gmane.emacs.devel:135658 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, > ding@gnus.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 04:20:39 +0900 > > > The original problem was that some people do not pay attention to what > > "bzr status" says, and just do a "bzr ci", which pushes all the > > modified files. I guess there's no way around vigilance. > > No, there isn't. However, committing all changes, using > branch-per-feature in your workflow, and using appropriate commit > messages for coherent changesets can reduce the amount of effort > needed to implement vigilance. True.