From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76415 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:22:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83d3n5t6wp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei7makon.fsf@gnu.org> <838vxuaek9.fsf@gnu.org> <877hdebm01.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <831v3ma532.fsf@gnu.org> <8739o2bjci.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83wrle8p8q.fsf@gnu.org> <87lj1t1wuz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <878vxt1b1i.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297012970 17938 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2011 17:22:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 17:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 06 18:22:45 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pm8Jv-0006uD-CO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:22:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58690 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pm8Jv-0002iw-5T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 12:22:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48403 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pm8Jo-0002ic-H4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 12:22:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pm8Jj-0002GX-RM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 12:22:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:48790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pm8Jj-0002G5-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 12:22:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LG700M00H21Y000@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:22:05 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.171.5]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LG700LVBHKQZNE0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:22:03 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <878vxt1b1i.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135647 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76415 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, > ding@gnus.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:40:25 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > > > Cc: Ted Zlatanov , > > > ding@gnus.org, > > > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:49:08 +0900 > > > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > > > By "user" I _did_ mean developers in this case. How do we prevent the > > > > danger of committing a modified file? > > > > > > By using a real branch instead of a checkout. > > > > Are you saying that "bzr push" will somehow catch these problems where > > "bzr commit" in a bound branch doesn't? > > Of course not. I'm saying that one needs to use an appropriate > workflow to get the desired behavior. So what workflow will avoid this danger? Can you show the commands in that workflow for when a changeset is ready to be committed to the master repo?