% mark in summary line not documented

% mark in summary line not documented

[Kai Großjohann]

I searched for `%' in the Gnus info file: the % mark is not
documented.  Any takers?

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)

Re: % mark in summary line not documented

[Sriram Karra]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> I searched for `%' in the Gnus info file: the % mark is not
> documented.  Any takers?

Review the following diffs.  It has been a while since I used the
agent.  So check for correctness as well.

-karra

Index: gnus.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/gnus.texi,v
retrieving revision 6.332
diff -u -r6.332 gnus.texi
--- gnus.texi	2002/10/11 12:14:56	6.332
+++ gnus.texi	2002/10/16 11:43:33
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 \makeindex
 \begin{document}
 
-\newcommand{\gnusversionname}{Oort Gnus v0.07}
+\newcommand{\gnusversionname}{Oort Gnus v0.08}
 \newcommand{\gnuschaptername}{}
 \newcommand{\gnussectionname}{}
 
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@
 spool or your mbox file.  All at the same time, if you want to push your
 luck.
 
-This manual corresponds to Oort Gnus v0.07.
+This manual corresponds to Oort Gnus v0.08.
 
 @end ifinfo
 
@@ -5674,6 +5674,20 @@
 Articles that haven't been seen before in Gnus by the user are marked
 with a @samp{.} in the second column (@code{gnus-unseen-mark}).
 Compare with @code{gnus-recent-mark}.
+
+@item
+@vindex gnus-undownloaded-mark
+When using the Gnus agent@xref{Agent Basics}, all articles might be
+downloaded.  Such articles cannot be viewed while you are ``offline''
+and can be identified by this mark in the summary buffer.  This could
+happen, for example, if an article is very big.
+
+@item
+@vindex gnus-downloadable-mark
+When using the Gnus agent @xref{Agent Basics}, you can specifically
+mark some articles to be downloaded.  You might want to do this, for
+example, with articles that were not fetched automatically by Gnus and
+are marked with the gnus-undownloaded-mark.
 
 @item
 @vindex gnus-not-empty-thread-mark

-- 
Well, all's well that ends.

Re: % mark in summary line not documented

[Sriram Karra]

dme@dme.org writes:

> * karra@shakti.homelinux.net [2002-10-16 11:53:54]
>
> Could this:
>
>> -This manual corresponds to Oort Gnus v0.07.
>> +This manual corresponds to Oort Gnus v0.08.
>
> Be replaced with:
>
>> -This manual corresponds to Oort Gnus v0.07.
>> +This manual corresponds to \gnusversionname.
>
> ?

No.  It is not possible because the \newcommand thingy is a raw tex
command and is included in a @iftex region, meaning that the command
is available only while generating PS and other printed copies...

>> +@item
>> +@vindex gnus-undownloaded-mark
>> +When using the Gnus agent@xref{Agent Basics}, all articles might be
>> +downloaded.
>
> It seems that this should be "might _not_ be downloaded".
>

You are right.  That was a typo.

Here are the new diffs:

Index: gnus.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/gnus.texi,v
retrieving revision 6.332
diff -u -r6.332 gnus.texi
--- gnus.texi	2002/10/11 12:14:56	6.332
+++ gnus.texi	2002/10/16 12:11:25
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 \makeindex
 \begin{document}
 
-\newcommand{\gnusversionname}{Oort Gnus v0.07}
+\newcommand{\gnusversionname}{Oort Gnus v0.08}
 \newcommand{\gnuschaptername}{}
 \newcommand{\gnussectionname}{}
 
@@ -383,7 +383,8 @@
 spool or your mbox file.  All at the same time, if you want to push your
 luck.
 
-This manual corresponds to Oort Gnus v0.07.
+This manual corresponds to 
+\gnusversionname
 
 @end ifinfo
 
@@ -5674,6 +5675,20 @@
 Articles that haven't been seen before in Gnus by the user are marked
 with a @samp{.} in the second column (@code{gnus-unseen-mark}).
 Compare with @code{gnus-recent-mark}.
+
+@item
+@vindex gnus-undownloaded-mark
+When using the Gnus agent@xref{Agent Basics}, all articles might not
+be downloaded.  Such articles cannot be viewed while you are
+``offline'' and can be identified by this mark in the summary buffer.
+This could happen, for example, if an article is very big.
+
+@item
+@vindex gnus-downloadable-mark
+When using the Gnus agent @xref{Agent Basics}, you can specifically
+mark some articles to be downloaded.  You might want to do this, for
+example, with articles that were not fetched automatically by Gnus and
+are marked with the gnus-undownloaded-mark.
 
 @item
 @vindex gnus-not-empty-thread-mark

-- 
Well, all's well that ends.

Re: % mark in summary line not documented

[Kai Großjohann]

Sriram Karra <karra@shakti.homelinux.net> writes:

> Here are the new diffs:

I adapted this a little bit.  I hope you don't mind.  I will commit
it when I have net access.

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)

Re: % mark in summary line not documented

[Sriram Karra]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> Sriram Karra <karra@shakti.homelinux.net> writes:
>
>> Here are the new diffs:
>
> I adapted this a little bit.  I hope you don't mind. 

not at all.

-- 
Well, all's well that ends.

Re: % mark in summary line not documented

[Henrik Enberg]

Sriram Karra <karra@shakti.homelinux.net> writes:

> +@vindex gnus-undownloaded-mark
> +When using the Gnus agent@xref{Agent Basics}, all articles might be
                                                                   ^
Insert a "not" there.

> +downloaded.  Such articles cannot be viewed while you are ``offline''
> +and can be identified by this mark in the summary buffer.  This could
> +happen, for example, if an article is very big.

Maybe explain how to change what the agent considers to be a big
article.  I don't really get it myself.

-- 
Booting... /vmemacs.el

Re: % mark in summary line not documented

[Kai Großjohann]

Henrik Enberg <henrik@enberg.org> writes:

> Maybe explain how to change what the agent considers to be a big
> article.  I don't really get it myself.

See the variable gnus-agent-long-article.  Seems to be quite simple,
no?  Even I understand it :-)  (But I don't use it, so my
understanding might be wrong.)

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)

Re: % mark in summary line not documented

[Frank Schmitt]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> I searched for `%' in the Gnus info file: the % mark is not
> documented.  Any takers?

It is:

File: gnus, Node: Formatting Basics, Next: Mode Line Formatting,
Prev: Formatting Variables, Up: Formatting Variables

(It's a bit hidden, I did only find it by accident, too)

-- 
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.