From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/48440
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Add hooks to Gnus on move/edit/delete?
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:08:40 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <84bs329yrb.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <vafelc1g6p6.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3smwgzpnn.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<84fzsgk72x.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3vg1cy6vo.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
	<847kdswkd6.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m31y40rxi5.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
	<84fzsfs5il.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3r8bzdspp.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041336559 22377 80.91.224.249 (31 Dec 2002 12:09:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:09:19 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18TLCw-0005om-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:09:18 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 18TLCy-0007GH-00; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 06:09:20 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 31 Dec 2002 06:10:13 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA16891
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 06:10:01 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from fwd00.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 18TLCf-0005B9-08; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:09:01 +0100
Original-Received: from lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de (520080024987-0001@[80.135.125.195]) by fmrl00.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 18TLCY-1SvxkOC; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:08:54 +0100
Original-Received: by lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 989C143ACF; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:08:40 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu
In-Reply-To: <m3r8bzdspp.fsf@heechee.beld.net> (Ted Zlatanov's message of
 "Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:53:22 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Sender: 520080024987-0001@t-dialin.net
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48440
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48440

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de wrote:
>> Well, nnmail-split-methods (or nnmail-split-fancy) could use spam.el
>> to put spam messages into a special group.  spam.el could invoke
>> ifile, telling it to use ~/.idata.spam.  After this, `normal'
>> ifile-gnus processing could be done on the remaining ham.
>
> On second thought, why not have something like 
>
> (: spam-split)
> (: ifile-split)
>
> in the split rules?

That might implement my suggestion.  I haven't tried it :-)  If it
works, it's a really good idea.

(I wonder if spam.el needs to tell ifile to use another index file.)
-- 
Ambibibentists unite!