From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/48363
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Add hooks to Gnus on move/edit/delete?
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 19:53:06 +0100
Organization: University of Dortmund, Germany
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <84fzsfs5il.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <vafelc1g6p6.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <m3smwgzpnn.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
 <84fzsgk72x.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <m3vg1cy6vo.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
 <847kdswkd6.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <m31y40rxi5.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041274819 22379 80.91.224.249 (30 Dec 2002 19:00:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 19:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from util1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.22])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18T593-0005oI-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:00:13 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by util1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18T52d-0001zd-00; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:53:35 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:54:27 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (quimby.gnus.org [80.91.224.244])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA13443
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:54:11 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18T52H-0008Hs-00
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 19:53:13 +0100
Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu
Original-Path: not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Original-Lines: 18
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: p50877cb3.dip.t-dialin.net
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1041274393 31421 80.135.124.179 (30 Dec 2002 18:53:13 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Dec 2002 18:53:13 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6E6MYnRLo5j18I8N5PB4GpIIbvQ=
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48363
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48363

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de wrote:
>
>> Maybe a two-stage process is better: first decide whether it's spam
>> or not, then distribute the non-spam to the right groups.
>
> I'm not sure how that would work.

Well, nnmail-split-methods (or nnmail-split-fancy) could use spam.el
to put spam messages into a special group.  spam.el could invoke
ifile, telling it to use ~/.idata.spam.  After this, `normal'
ifile-gnus processing could be done on the remaining ham.

The above is meant to be a description of the desired behavior, not a
suggestion for the implementation.
-- 
Ambibibentists unite!