From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76983 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nyc4bos@aol.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnregistry problem Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:48:36 -0500 Message-ID: <84k4gvcl3f.fsf@aol.com> References: <84hbcagf6s.fsf@aol.com> <871v3bviik.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298181026 24885 80.91.229.12 (20 Feb 2011 05:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 05:50:26 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25316@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Feb 20 06:50:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2Ba-00055n-Fc for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:50:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2BP-0007nx-Nr; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:50:11 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2BO-0007nb-68 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:50:10 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2BK-0001Rc-8C for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:50:10 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2BJ-0004To-Gc for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:50:05 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr2BI-00052W-VZ for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:50:05 +0100 Original-Received: from 216.57.89.58 ([216.57.89.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:50:04 +0100 Original-Received: from nyc4bos by 216.57.89.58 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:50:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.57.89.58 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:y5jC0YGuPgsCz+eVWQs3nLhySGI= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76983 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > nyc4bos@aol.com writes: > >> I was reading gmane.emacs.gnus.general and read the message >> from Norbet Koch with the subject "Re: Your public key". >> >> Message-ID: >> >> I typed ^ (gnus-summary-refer-parent-article) and got the >> message: >> >> No such function: nnregistry-request-group > > And that function really doesn't exist. > > What's your `gnus-refer-article-method' variable? Value: (current (nnregistry) (nnweb "google" (nnweb-type google))) Original value was current Maybe something in Gnus has changed but I got this off of this list. If I just remove it, will that harm anything?