From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann)
Subject: Re: 'g' in the group buffer still very slow
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:52:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84lm2skbjt.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d6o5et2g.fsf@gmx.de>
Martin Rohde <martin.rohde@gmx.de> writes:
> Sorry, I mixed some things up.
> All it saves is the sending of "MyNOOP". It is wrong to speak of
> "saving time".
Ah, it saves sending that command! Okay, I completely missed that.
That's a minor point, but it *is* an advantage.
> It just saves the additional code in nntp-open-connection, that's
> why I prefer it. But the other version works as well, so if you're
> prefering your way, I can send you the working patch, too.
No, now I'm convinced that the no-MyNOOP way is better. So I agree
with you.
> Yes, but i couldn't see a
>
> (make-local-variable nntp-open-connection-function)
>
> anywhere. Furthermore, I am not in a special buffer, when I check it
> (or am I?), so that's why I asked.
Whee. Well, err. The Gnus backend code is pretty convoluted, and I
believe any number of wonders that can be done with nnoo.
Ah, and nntp-open-connection-function is defvoo'd, not defvar'd. That
explains it all. I started to look in defvoo and then in nnoo-define,
but I get lost in a twisty maze of little backquotes... Anyhow, I'm
almost sure that nnoo has some magic to make the variable local.
Anyone?
> I thought, it would make the start of gnus a bit faster when you are
> using nntp-open-network-stream, because otherwise you would still
> have the delay from nntp-accept-response when nntp-send-command is
> called for the first time.
Hm. This happens if the first command doesn't produce a response,
right? Anyhow, it's not so important. Just leave it like that but a
comment (connections created with nntp-open-network-stream will never
echo; don't bother checking for echoes there) would be nice.
>> Secondly, and this is the logic part, the check-for-echo variable
>> starts out as nil. I didn't look very closely, but I thought that the
>> echo check is skipped when the variable is nil...
>
> Its global value is nil, but in nntp-make-process-buffer it is
> initialized as
>
> (set (make-local-variable 'nntp-process-delete-echo) t)
>
> The (defvar nntp-process-delete-echo nil) ist just a dummy
> declaration (because of "free variable"-warnings). For it has to be
> checked locally in the server-buffers, it doesn't matter, what its
> global value is, as you explained before.
What do you think about making it (defvar nntp-process-delete-echo t),
then then, in nntp-make-process-buffer, to just do
(make-local-variable 'nntp-process-delete-echo)?
It might make it a little bit clearer what is the default value of the
variable, so outsiders have a better chance of understanding the code.
Just my two cents.
In general, this is good stuff!
--
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn (Frank Nobis)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-14 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-21 20:16 Sebastian D.B. Krause
2002-07-26 12:45 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-07-26 12:52 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-12-08 18:00 ` Sebastian D.B. Krause
2002-12-08 19:45 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-12-08 20:28 ` Sebastian D.B. Krause
2002-12-08 23:33 ` Martin Rohde
2002-12-09 7:49 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-12-09 14:02 ` Martin Rohde
2002-12-09 17:22 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-12-09 22:38 ` Martin Rohde
2002-12-10 18:30 ` Martin Rohde
2002-12-11 4:13 ` kgreiner
2002-12-11 20:05 ` Martin Rohde
2002-12-11 21:09 ` kgreiner
2002-12-12 11:37 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-12-13 15:41 ` Martin Rohde
2002-12-13 16:24 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-12-13 17:18 ` Martin Rohde
2002-12-14 12:52 ` Kai Großjohann [this message]
2002-12-14 14:11 ` Martin Rohde
2002-12-11 8:21 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-12-09 8:36 ` Kai Großjohann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84lm2skbjt.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--to=kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).