From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50087 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Strange auto-caching Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:16:09 +0100 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <84of5gzb0m.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <84hebdjx6q.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84adh2ojww.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84vfzqpquk.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84wuk661dc.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84r8adq0c4.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84heb91ln9.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045135200 20885 80.91.224.249 (13 Feb 2003 11:20:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18jHMA-0005E5-00 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:16:42 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18jHMb-0008Qg-00; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:17:09 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:18:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA07428 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:17:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 83300 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2003 11:16:51 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 83294 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 11:16:50 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 13 Feb 2003 11:16:50 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18jHWW-0003Jb-00 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:27:24 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 43 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: p50877e4f.dip.t-dialin.net Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1045135644 12360 80.135.126.79 (13 Feb 2003 11:27:24 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Feb 2003 11:27:24 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 Cancel-Lock: sha1:7CUcU8/l9o596kSD/x99VdPP0kU= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50087 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50087 Kevin Greiner writes: > OK, I went back to your original post. It appears that you always > fetch articles by selecting them. That means that you're always > calling gnus-agent-fetch-selected-article. > [...] > I know that you don't want to consider that g-s-u-a-l is the problem. Yeah, I've been a really stubborn thickhead, haven't I? (You don't have to answer.) I think you're onto something, because I think that the problem with the bogus `not downloaded' highlighting comes from articles that I have selected before and then hit M-u on them. This means that gnus-summary-update-article-line was in fact called. So I think you're right after all. > However, I believe that you can test it fairly easily. > > I'd like you to do the following in your summary buffer. > > M-: (let ((inhibit-read-only t)) (upcase-region (point-min) (point-max))) > > This will upcase your entire summary. It will look ugly but it will > sure help ID any changes to the text. Now, try to read some of the > unfetched articles. If g-s-u-a-l is working correctly the selected > article's line will refresh to mixed-case. If it isn't working > correctly, some other line will refresh. > > Let me know what happens when the download status is wrong. I tried it immediately. But I will try it in a group where the highlighting is wrong. For a group where the highlighting is not wrong, I observe: (a) the correct line is changed (b) the change in the current line only affects the color and the `R' mark (which appears on selecting and disappears on M-u). The rest of the summary line is not changed -- it stays uppercase. -- A turnip curses Elvis