* mail-source-delete-incoming t in CVS gnus? @ 2003-05-25 10:03 Robert Epprecht 2003-05-26 5:03 ` Kai Großjohann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Robert Epprecht @ 2003-05-25 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw) After a CVS update 'mail-source-delete-incoming' is 't' on my system. Is this intended? Robert Epprecht ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mail-source-delete-incoming t in CVS gnus? 2003-05-25 10:03 mail-source-delete-incoming t in CVS gnus? Robert Epprecht @ 2003-05-26 5:03 ` Kai Großjohann [not found] ` <84u1bis3js.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duis?= =?iso-8859-1?q?burg.de> 2003-10-18 13:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Kai Großjohann @ 2003-05-26 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw) Robert Epprecht <epprecht@solnet.ch> writes: > After a CVS update 'mail-source-delete-incoming' is 't' on my system. > Is this intended? Well, err. Hm. I'm not sure if it's the right thing to do. OT1H, Gnus 5.10 is a released (beta?) version, rather than a development version like Oort. Only bugfixes are supposed to go into Gnus 5.10. But OTOH, maybe the release status should only be assigned to the tarballs? (In case it wasn't clear, setting mail-source-delete-incoming protects you from losing mail due to the unstableness of Gnus, and the variable should default to t for stable versions of Gnus.) -- This line is not blank. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <84u1bis3js.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duis?= =?iso-8859-1?q?burg.de>]
* Re: mail-source-delete-incoming t in CVS gnus? [not found] ` <84u1bis3js.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duis?= =?iso-8859-1?q?burg.de> @ 2003-05-26 14:50 ` Robert Epprecht 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Robert Epprecht @ 2003-05-26 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw) kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) writes: > Robert Epprecht <epprecht@solnet.ch> writes: > >> After a CVS update 'mail-source-delete-incoming' is 't' on my system. >> Is this intended? > > Well, err. Hm. I'm not sure if it's the right thing to do. Nor am I ;-) > maybe the release status should only be assigned to the tarballs? I think so... Otherwise we could miss the right time to set it back, and then it could be too late. Robert ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mail-source-delete-incoming t in CVS gnus? 2003-05-26 5:03 ` Kai Großjohann [not found] ` <84u1bis3js.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duis?= =?iso-8859-1?q?burg.de> @ 2003-10-18 13:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2003-10-18 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw) kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) writes: > But OTOH, maybe the release status should only be assigned to the > tarballs? Yup. I've now added this to the release script. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-18 13:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-25 10:03 mail-source-delete-incoming t in CVS gnus? Robert Epprecht
2003-05-26 5:03 ` Kai Großjohann
[not found] ` <84u1bis3js.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duis?= =?iso-8859-1?q?burg.de>
2003-05-26 14:50 ` Robert Epprecht
2003-10-18 13:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).