Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann)
Subject: Re: total and auto expiry
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:17:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84wuj3krdk.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ysmtrf74n.fsf@myxomop.com> (Alexander Kotelnikov's message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:34:16 -0500")

Alexander Kotelnikov <sacha@myxomop.com> writes:

>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:25:32 +0100
>>>>>> "KG" == Kai Großjohann <kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de> wrote:
> KG> 
> KG> Alexander Kotelnikov <sacha@forexware.com> writes:
>>> Does this mean that the only difference between actions that are taken
>>> over groups matching 'total' and 'auto' it that the former will be
>>> expired even if expiry-wait for it is 'never?
> KG> 
> KG> No.  I think setting expiry-wait to never means that nothing is
> KG> expired.
> KG> 
> KG> Normally, you can mark a message as expirable by hitting `E'.
> KG> 
> KG> Auto-expire means that Gnus hits `E' for you.  Nothing more, nothing
> KG> less.
> KG> 
> KG> Total-expire means that messages marked E are expirable, as always,
> KG> but *also* messages marked r, R, Y, K and so on are considered
> KG> expirable.
>
> Thus the one difference is an article's mark. Its destiny, to be or
> not to be expired, is the same, if group is matched with total or auto
> variable.

Yes.

> This also means that "total" described as dangerous is not too much
> more dangerous than "auto", isn't it?

Before you turned on total-expire, you might have read hundreds of
messages which are suddenly considered expirable.

This is (potentially) dangerous.

> KG> Adaptive scoring does not work with auto-expire because it depends on
> KG> the different marks r, R, Y, K etc.  But using auto-expire means that
> KG> messages will be marked E, instead.
> KG> 
> KG> It used to be that total-expire was slower than auto-expire.  I don't
> KG> know whether this is still true.
>
> So it can be advised to use total with adaptive scoring and auto
> otherwise. At first approximation they are the same.

Except for the above, yes.

Another difference is that total-expire means that you lose one
mark.  With auto-expire, you can distinguish between ticked (!),
dormant (?) and read (R) articles, all of which are kept.  With
total-expire, you only have ticked and dormant.

-- 
A preposition is not a good thing to end a sentence with.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-13 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-13 14:50 Alexander Kotelnikov
2003-03-13 17:25 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-03-13 18:34   ` Alexander Kotelnikov
2003-03-13 18:54     ` David S Goldberg
2003-03-13 19:17     ` Kai Großjohann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84wuj3krdk.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de \
    --to=kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).