From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50026 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Strange auto-caching Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:19:24 +0100 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <84y94mpqv7.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <84hebdjx6q.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84adh2ojww.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044991173 27732 80.91.224.249 (11 Feb 2003 19:19:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ifwH-0007Cf-00 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:19:29 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18ifx3-0006GZ-00; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:20:17 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:21:14 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA02678 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:21:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 31499 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2003 19:20:00 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 31494 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2003 19:19:59 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 11 Feb 2003 19:19:59 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18ig6D-0005bX-00 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:29:45 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 24 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e1e727.dip.t-dialin.net Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1044991785 21534 217.225.231.39 (11 Feb 2003 19:29:45 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 2003 19:29:45 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 Cancel-Lock: sha1:yJ/c+hPTR7BB5KwYimS2xvFmlxc= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50026 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50026 Kevin Greiner writes: > The critical issue is, how did your fetch the articles? Were they > fetched prior to opening the group, in the group using one of the > agent commands, or by using the gnus-agent-fetch-selected-article > method? Usually, articles are fetched using `J s' from the group buffer, but sometimes some of them might be fetched by way of gnus-agent-fetch-selected-article. I very rarely use `J u' from the group buffer, and almost never use `J S' from a summary buffer. AFAICT, how the article was fetched has no influence on %O. Only when it is fetched makes a difference. I can't give an exact time, though. Maybe it's the previous Emacs session. Maybe it's the presence of `.'? > When you re-entered the group, were the %O fields identical to the > sample above? Yes. -- A turnip curses Elvis