From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/47435
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:25:05 +0200
Organization: University of Dortmund, Germany
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <84znt1s7z2.fsf@crybaby.uni-duisburg.de>
References: <kpu1ja1s9v.fsf@wintermute.casa> <ilusmyuec0f.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
 <kpd6py1mo1.fsf@wintermute.casa> <84elaea0xd.fsf@crybaby.uni-duisburg.de>
 <kpy98mz9x4.fsf@wintermute.casa> <m3n0p1d9ci.fsf@defun.localdomain>
 <kp7kg5zbva.fsf@wintermute.casa>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035642479 8863 80.91.224.249 (26 Oct 2002 14:27:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:27:59 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 185Ruw-0002Io-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:27:58 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 185RuN-00084i-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:27:23 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:28:06 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA03016
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:27:52 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 2099 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2002 14:27:02 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 2094 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2002 14:27:00 -0000
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2002 14:27:00 -0000
Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 185Q25-00005A-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:27:13 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Original-Lines: 12
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e1e070.dip.t-dialin.net
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1035635233 32308 217.225.224.112 (26 Oct 2002 12:27:13 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Oct 2002 12:27:13 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y0lScR9hGGq3Frx37iRatTOQeAs=
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:47435
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:47435

Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:

> It solves the problem on my side, but is the syntax of the message
> sent correct? Shouldn't it have the Mime-Version header?

The original message should have had the Mime-Version header, yes.
But then, it's not your fault, nor Gnus' fault.  I gather that the
original message that looked fishy was not sent from Gnus?

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)