From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Speed difference in Gnus
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:48:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85r7a9yiro.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ll0ihqn1.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
> David> M-x elp-instrument-package RET gnus RET
> David> Do something
> David> M-x elp-results RET
>
> Thanks, this function also exists in xemacs (and I did not know about
> it), in any case
> the information is very aehm spare:
> for emacs-21 I obtain:
> --8<------------------------schnipp------------------------->8---
> Function Name Call Count Elapsed Time Average Time
> ========================= ========== ============ ============
> gnus-summary-copy-article 1 14.03726 14.03726
> --8<------------------------schnapp------------------------->8---
> for xemacs 21.4.17 I get
> --8<------------------------schnipp------------------------->8---
> Function Name Call Count Elapsed Time Average Time
> ========================= ========== ============ ============
> gnus-summary-copy-article 1 15.869385 15.869385
> --8<------------------------schnapp------------------------->8---
Well, you should instrument the package _after_ loading all relevant
functions, or just the autoloads get instrumented.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-25 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87r7ap899o.fsf@xemacs.org>
2005-10-13 21:17 ` Reiner Steib
[not found] ` <434EFD44.7030601@xemacs.org>
[not found] ` <877jcgub0f.fsf@xemacs.org>
[not found] ` <434F3897.3050007@xemacs.org>
[not found] ` <873bn4tptq.fsf@xemacs.org>
[not found] ` <87d5m89wuf.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
[not found] ` <87y84nyuo0.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
[not found] ` <873bmulscb.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
[not found] ` <87pspypwzv.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
[not found] ` <sluuli82.fsf@smtprelay.t-online.de>
2005-10-24 16:52 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-24 18:24 ` David Kastrup
2005-10-25 9:50 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-25 10:48 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2005-10-25 17:50 ` Jesper Harder
2005-10-25 22:07 ` David Kastrup
2005-10-26 9:32 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-27 1:02 ` Ben Wing
2005-10-27 9:24 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-28 9:52 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-28 11:09 ` Simon Josefsson
2005-10-28 11:55 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-28 12:27 ` Simon Josefsson
2005-10-28 12:06 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-28 12:28 ` Simon Josefsson
2005-10-28 14:05 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-28 14:31 ` Simon Josefsson
2005-10-28 15:53 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-31 7:05 ` Ben Wing
2005-10-28 10:04 ` Uwe Brauer
2005-10-24 21:00 ` Reiner Steib
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85r7a9yiro.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).