From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66596 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap and Exchange 2007 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:47:50 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8663v6u4e1.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <48DD2FD744F23640B63C60A81E7679E70DA75BEB@exchange-d01.ppllc.com> <86iqz6vp7z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76abkilpuh.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206726384 15524 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2008 17:46:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "ding\@gnus.org" , Simon Josefsson To: Jake Colman Original-X-From: ding-owner+M15082@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Mar 28 18:46:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JfIf5-0004zg-Qr for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:46:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JfIeJ-0000PD-0c; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:45:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JfIeH-0000Ox-Js for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:45:53 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JfIeB-00034G-6c for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:45:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.blockstar.com ([170.224.69.95]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JfIeJ-000731-00 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:45:55 +0100 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com (unknown [38.98.147.130]) by mail.blockstar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3197D931A; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:50:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Hashcash: 1:20:080328:simon@josefsson.org::JmjdWHAmApxwqx+Q:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000008aOX X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:080328:colman@ppllc.com::yJAHlE9IWHfdYlIK:02xm5 X-Hashcash: 1:20:080328:ding@gnus.org::d9SNKN0jlTE8cb70:00002kae In-Reply-To: <76abkilpuh.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> (Jake Colman's message of "Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:29:10 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66596 Archived-At: On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:29:10 -0400 Jake Colman wrote: Jake> Using your alternate setup, would the IMAP mail be split appropriately Jake> into my "home" Maildir? I guess I'm still confused as to how I would Jake> convert from broken IMAP to a more uable alternative. You need to set up your split methods, since now nnmaildir (through nnmail) is doing the splitting: (setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy nnmail-split-fancy '(| (: gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent) (: spam-split 'spam-use-regex-headers) (: spam-split 'spam-use-bbdb) "mail")) This is just my setup, but you see how it works. Jake> Even with the patch, IMAP access is very slow and many actions result in Jake> a warning such as: Jake> (6) (error/warning) Error in process filter: (error Internal error, tag Jake> 201 status BAD code nil text The specified message set is invalid.) Sorry about that, save the log and post it here if you can. At this point, if you choose to use Exchange, you have to produce bug reports because I don't use it so I can't test any changes through normal usage. You'll have to enable imap-debug and submit the contents of the *imap-debug* buffer with your bug report. Simon Josefsson was the original imap.el developer and he hasn't responded to my Exchange bug reports recently so I don't know how quickly we'd resolve these issues. Simon, are you busy or unable to work on this stuff? Have you seen the Exchange problems, and is resolving them of interest to you? Ted