* [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues
@ 2024-11-30 1:23 James Thomas
2024-12-01 22:35 ` Björn Bidar
[not found] ` <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Thomas @ 2024-11-30 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Hi all,
Just want to let you know of my package for working with Codeberg.org:
https://codeberg.org/quotuva/nnforgejo
This is only a preview: viewing of a single ephemeral group, is the only
thing possible right now, but I hope to complete the rest in a few days.
Do let me know if you have any feedback (preferably here rather than
there, until this is finished).
Regards,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues
2024-11-30 1:23 [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues James Thomas
@ 2024-12-01 22:35 ` Björn Bidar
[not found] ` <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Björn Bidar @ 2024-12-01 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Thomas; +Cc: ding
Hey,
This looks awesome. I'm wondering if this kind of backend could be more
generic to support similar forges such as Gitlab or even Github.
A more general backtracker news backend would be great but I doubt
bucktrackers such Bugzilla work similar enough to those used in forges.
Should the nnforgejo backend also be added to
gnus-secondary-select-methods?
Schönen Tag,
Regards,
Björn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues
[not found] ` <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org>
@ 2024-12-08 2:19 ` James Thomas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Thomas @ 2024-12-08 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Björn Bidar wrote:
> This looks awesome.
Thank you!
> I'm wondering if this kind of backend could be more generic to support
> similar forges such as Gitlab or even Github.
This could be done in a future refactoring; but for those two this ought
to be kept in mind:
https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html
> Should the nnforgejo backend also be added to
> gnus-secondary-select-methods?
Only the ephemeral group works now (instructions are on the site) but I
hope to finish that up once I've tested the core well enough.
Regards,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-08 2:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-30 1:23 [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues James Thomas
2024-12-01 22:35 ` Björn Bidar
[not found] ` <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org>
2024-12-08 2:19 ` James Thomas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).