* [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues
@ 2024-11-30 1:23 James Thomas
2024-12-01 22:35 ` Björn Bidar
[not found] ` <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Thomas @ 2024-11-30 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Hi all,
Just want to let you know of my package for working with Codeberg.org:
https://codeberg.org/quotuva/nnforgejo
This is only a preview: viewing of a single ephemeral group, is the only
thing possible right now, but I hope to complete the rest in a few days.
Do let me know if you have any feedback (preferably here rather than
there, until this is finished).
Regards,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues 2024-11-30 1:23 [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues James Thomas @ 2024-12-01 22:35 ` Björn Bidar [not found] ` <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Björn Bidar @ 2024-12-01 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Thomas; +Cc: ding Hey, This looks awesome. I'm wondering if this kind of backend could be more generic to support similar forges such as Gitlab or even Github. A more general backtracker news backend would be great but I doubt bucktrackers such Bugzilla work similar enough to those used in forges. Should the nnforgejo backend also be added to gnus-secondary-select-methods? Schönen Tag, Regards, Björn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org>]
* Re: [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues [not found] ` <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org> @ 2024-12-08 2:19 ` James Thomas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: James Thomas @ 2024-12-08 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ding Björn Bidar wrote: > This looks awesome. Thank you! > I'm wondering if this kind of backend could be more generic to support > similar forges such as Gitlab or even Github. This could be done in a future refactoring; but for those two this ought to be kept in mind: https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html > Should the nnforgejo backend also be added to > gnus-secondary-select-methods? Only the ephemeral group works now (instructions are on the site) but I hope to finish that up once I've tested the core well enough. Regards, James ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-08 2:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-30 1:23 [ANN] nnforgejo: Gnus backend for Forgejo issues James Thomas
2024-12-01 22:35 ` Björn Bidar
[not found] ` <33931.8758969725$1733092609@news.gmane.org>
2024-12-08 2:19 ` James Thomas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).