From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87789 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: new (?) version of the old nnml problem Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:36:57 +0200 Message-ID: <867evjtf1i.fsf@zoho.com> References: <86wp3p28u5.fsf@zoho.com> <86shed284o.fsf@zoho.com> <86o9p127p4.fsf@zoho.com> <8760b9kewf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86376d24n7.fsf@zoho.com> <87wp3piytm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86tvytzqtp.fsf@zoho.com> <87vaj94ss4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86lgk5zmqy.fsf@zoho.com> <87shed34af.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86376axvhb.fsf@zoho.com> <87mv4hop66.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <86vaj5wwat.fsf@zoho.com> <87tvyplllw.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508945940 2945 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2017 15:39:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:39:00 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m36003@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Oct 25 17:38:55 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.35]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7NlZ-0007pU-1Q for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:38:49 +0200 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 9aa9829a-b99a-11e7-b60e-b499baabecb2; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1e7NkB-0005GZ-OP; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:37:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Nk7-0005Fp-SQ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:37:19 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Nk5-0002Od-TV for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:37:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Nk4-0006zA-IA for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:37:16 +0200 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Njq-0005b3-Eq for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:37:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 49 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:+kL6LvN1rOBouqMLqLGXLOZV2+k= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87789 Archived-At: Adam Sjøgren wrote: >> I got this. "YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR >> MESSAGE." OK, feels good to know :) > > That is something the email server on > raspberrypi.zoho.com is telling you, it seems. > > Apparently it is unable to talk to reach the > mx of gnu.org: > >> errors ----- [Status: Error, Address: >> , ResponseCode >> 421, Host not reachable.] > > Until the email is delivered, nothing will be > created in the bug tracker. It sure won't :) No, I knew that wasn't something on the GNU side. > You can find the bug tracker here: > > • https://debbugs.gnu.org/ > > And there is an Emacs-based interface: > > • http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/debbugs.html OK, thanks, I got the newsgroup up and there seems to be lots of activity there. First I thought I hade discovered a new playground for my own activity but upon reading the subjects almost none hade even a slight bearing to what I myself use and know. Either the Emacs World is huge, or people, even Emacs people, have poor taste... :) About this particular bug, it is a strange thing it doesn't attract more attention because it seems to be such a vital flaw. It seems to be a central problem (nnml? or just TLS/SSL?) but because of the lack of interest, perhaps it just appears in combination with certain mail service providers (e.g., mine, zoho). -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573