From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87206
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: IMAP changes timestamp when moving an article to another group
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:21:20 +0200
Organization: Probably a good idea
Message-ID: <867fbvja33.fsf@dod.no>
References: <m2a8gwrxem.fsf_-_@ecocode.net> <smubn1c9hic.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470424984 26322 195.159.176.226 (5 Aug 2016 19:23:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 19:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M35426@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Aug 05 21:23:01 2016
Return-path: <ding-owner+M35426@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M35426@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1bVkhi-0005ky-G4
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:22:46 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M35426@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1bVkgd-00020e-85; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:21:39 -0500
Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32])
	by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <junkmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1bVkgZ-000204-HL
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:21:35 -0500
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <junkmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1bVkgX-0005pI-6w
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:21:35 -0500
Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1bVkgV-000130-Nh
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:21:31 +0200
Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1bVkgP-0006T8-TJ
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:21:25 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 9
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
Mail-Copies-To: never
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ajbMJQmc1MGh5X7mvDji/n7mc54=
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87206
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87206>

>>>>> Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com>:

> But, I think preserving the received date on copy is probably more
> useful overall.

Agreed.  

Or actually, I would say it even stronger: preserving the received date
on copy is the only correct behaviour.