From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12215 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Don Croyle Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Some thoughts on NoCeM and switching servers Date: 20 Sep 1997 22:24:47 -0500 Organization: Minimal at best Message-ID: <867mcbic1s.fsf@gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us> References: <199709181429.KAA11098@kyoto.intertv.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151790 2523 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:09:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA16069 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 21:32:14 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA06429 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 23:28:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 05:24:39 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5196 invoked by uid 504); 21 Sep 1997 03:24:28 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 5193 invoked from network); 21 Sep 1997 03:24:27 -0000 Original-Received: from fw2-51.fwi.com (HELO gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us) (207.113.68.130) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 21 Sep 1997 03:24:21 -0000 Original-Received: (from croyle@localhost) by gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (8.8.7/8.8.5) id WAA03296; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 22:24:52 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "20 Sep 1997 20:13:32 +0200" Original-Lines: 23 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.2 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12215 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12215 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Scott Hofmann writes: > > - if NoCeM is creating its active file then it should consider all > > NoCeM messages as "read" so that gnus doesn't spend hours and hours > > reading NoCeM messages during gnus' first invocation on a new > > server. > > But that might be what some people would want -- fetch all the NoCeM > messages so that all spam would be NoCeM'ed out. Perhaps Gnus could ask how many NoCeM messages to read like it does when opening a large group? It'd also be nice if it differentiated between types of NoCeM's so that someone could accept, for example, Chris Lewis's anti-spam NoCeM's and ignore the anti-troll ones. Largely moot to me now, since I'm running NoCeM on spool, but I tried using gnus-nocem once and gave up when my connection died after 29 hours. -- I've always wanted to be a dilettante, but I've never quite been ready to make the commitment.