Re: spam.el binds too many keys to `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam'

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:32:05 +0200 Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> wrote: 

RS> On Tue, Apr 01 2008, Johan Bockgård wrote:
>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>>> I think those keys were chosen by consensus because several people
>>> liked different bindings.  

RS> If we'd use this policy ("several people like different bindings"), we
RS> will end up with no available bindings very soon.

I was not proposing that policy, only reminiscing.

>>> I think `S x' should be the default, and Mst/Msx/M-d should go
>>> away, but I really don't have strong feelings for any of those key
>>> bindings.  I use C-s personally, FWIW, because it's such a useful
>>> operation.

RS> Thinking more about it, I think that the `S ...' bindings are
RS> completely misplaced.  All other `S ...' are replying/posting related.

RS> | (gnus-define-keys gnus-summary-mode-map
RS> |   "St" spam-generic-score
RS> |   "Sx" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam
RS> |   "Mst" spam-generic-score
RS> |   "Msx" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam
RS> |   "\M-d" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam)

>> I use $.

RS> Me too.  ;-)

RS> But I'm talking about the default key bindings which also occupy
RS> bindings for users not using `spam.el' at all.

My point about C-s was that most users will bind it to something shorter
quickly.  I really don't have any attachment to the current bindings.

Maybe `,' (comma) would work?  I could get used to `,,' (comma + comma)
for gnus-summary-mark-as-spam, and `,=' (comma + equals) for
spam-generic-score.  I don't know the Emacs + Gnus conventions, though,
so this may be a bad idea.

Ted