Re: And, bump again.

[David Rogers <davidandrewrogers@gmail.com>]

Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun 03 Mar 2013, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
>> Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> writes:
>>
>>> * I would like to remove the check for virtual-ness in
>>>   gnus-warp-to-article.
>>>
>>> * I believe that removal to be OK.  I'll test it here, of course, and
>>>   I'm a daily user of warping.
>>
>> I'm not familiar with the warping stuff, so somebody who uses this
>> should respond to this...
>
> ...and while this is being worked on, they could fix the manual. The
> term "warp" is used, but never defined, leaving the user with no idea as
> to it's purpose.


Sounds like somebody was trying to make a cute "Star Trek" reference to
travelling a long distance across the galaxy in a short time. Certainly not
the kind of thing that can go unexplained - probably better to use a
normal word such as "jump". 

-- 
David