From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86850 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Frank Haun Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus cleanup Date: 13 Feb 2016 12:00:22 -0000 Organization: nil Message-ID: <86egcgajob.fsf@m7008.fhaun.de> References: <87h9hied21.fsf@gnus.org> <87fuwyy302.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455365906 7009 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2016 12:18:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 13 13:18:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUZ9V-0001Qw-Q5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:18:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41540 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUZ9U-0001NP-UA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:18:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUZ9C-0001N3-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:17:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUZ98-0003RN-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:17:57 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUZ97-0003RC-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:17:54 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUZ95-00018r-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:17:51 +0100 Original-Received: from x5d835b14.dyn.telefonica.de ([93.131.91.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:17:51 +0100 Original-Received: from fh by x5d835b14.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:17:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Followup-To: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x5d835b14.dyn.telefonica.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:t29FGLZwdpUWg5FhM7G+BBmjBZ0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199869 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86850 Archived-At: On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:19:25 +1100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I've now completed the first pass over the Gnus sources, First to say, thanks for that work. It seems Gnus gets faster and faster. Does it really? I use Gnus on a Raspberry Pi 2 and every speed improvement is very welcome. ;-) Something I noticed is, switching back to Gnus before the cleanup isn't a good idea. E.g. `gnus-summary-refer-parent-article' doesn't work then. Frank Fup2 gmane.emacs.gnus.general