Re: smtpmail and starttls improvement when starttls program is missing

Re: smtpmail and starttls improvement when starttls program is missing

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:

> Currently, smtpmail-open-stream will quietly fail if the starttls /
> gnutls program is not available.  The changes below (starttls diff is
> against the Gnus trunk but it shouldn't matter) introduce the function
> starttls-any-program-available which will return either starttls-program
> or starttls-gnutls-program, whichever is usable.  It also shows a
> message, so a user can see in *Messages* that no STARTTLS protocol
> transport is available.  smtpmail-open-stream then uses the function,
> simplifying the logic flow.

> The message will only be shown when starttls-any-program-available is
> called, but note that it is called by smtpmail-open-stream iff there is
> a match for the server in smtpmail-starttls-credentials.  This means the
> user won't see the message unless he has an entry for the server that
> implies he wants STARTTLS.

> Let me know what you think...  Thanks
> Ted

> Index: starttls.el
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/lisp/starttls.el,v
> retrieving revision 7.19
> diff -c -r7.19 starttls.el
> *** starttls.el 19 May 2008 08:47:42 -0000      7.19
> --- starttls.el 29 Oct 2008 21:15:29 -0000
> ***************
> *** 295,300 ****
> --- 295,314 ----
>         (starttls-set-process-query-on-exit-flag process nil)
>         process)))

> + (defun starttls-any-program-available ()
> +   (let ((program (if starttls-use-gnutls
> +                    starttls-gnutls-program
> +                  starttls-program)))
> +     (condition-case ()
> +       (with-no-warnings
> +         (require 'starttls)
> +         (call-process program)
> +         program)
> +       (error (progn
> +              (message "No STARTTLS program was available (tried '%s')"
> +                       program)
> +              nil)))))
> +
>   (provide 'starttls)

>   ;; arch-tag: 648b3bd8-63bd-47f5-904c-7c819aea2297

I think `with-no-warnings' and `(require 'starttls)' are unnecessary.
For `with-no-warnings', it binds `byte-compile-warnings' to nil
when compiling.  It is for making the byte compiler silent on any
form, however there seems nothing to be warned when compiling.
In addition, `with-no-warnings' is not available in Emacs 21 and
XEmacs that Gnus supports, so the warning like the following is
issued when compiling Gnus:

While compiling the end of the data in file gnus/lisp/starttls.el:
  ** The function `with-no-warnings' is not known to be defined.

It is not serious since the function will not be used with those
versions of Emacsen, though.

For `(require 'starttls)', the reason I say it is unnecessary is
that the function is defined in starttls.el that provides the
`starttls' feature. ;-)  Therefore the function can be rewritten
like the following, isn't it?

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun starttls-any-program-available ()
  (let ((program (if starttls-use-gnutls
		     starttls-gnutls-program
		   starttls-program)))
    (condition-case ()
	(progn
	  (call-process program)
	  program)
      (error (progn
	       (message "No STARTTLS program was available (tried '%s')"
			program)
	       nil)))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> Index: lisp/mail/smtpmail.el
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /sources/emacs/emacs/lisp/mail/smtpmail.el,v
> retrieving revision 1.105
> diff -c -r1.105 smtpmail.el
> *** lisp/mail/smtpmail.el       7 Jun 2008 02:41:06 -0000       1.105
> --- lisp/mail/smtpmail.el       29 Oct 2008 21:16:26 -0000
> ***************
> *** 503,515 ****
>   (defun smtpmail-open-stream (process-buffer host port)
>     (let ((cred (smtpmail-find-credentials
>                smtpmail-starttls-credentials host port)))
> !     (if (null (and cred (condition-case ()
> !                           (with-no-warnings
> !                             (require 'starttls)
> !                             (call-process (if starttls-use-gnutls
> !                                               starttls-gnutls-program
> !                                             starttls-program)))
> !                         (error nil))))
>         ;; The normal case.
>         (open-network-stream "SMTP" process-buffer host port)
>         (let* ((cred-key (smtpmail-cred-key cred))
> --- 503,509 ----
>   (defun smtpmail-open-stream (process-buffer host port)
>     (let ((cred (smtpmail-find-credentials
>                smtpmail-starttls-credentials host port)))
> !     (if (null (and cred (starttls-any-program-available)))
>         ;; The normal case.
>         (open-network-stream "SMTP" process-buffer host port)
>         (let* ((cred-key (smtpmail-cred-key cred))

Regards,

Re: smtpmail and starttls improvement when starttls program is missing

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:53:17 +0900 Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> wrote: 

KY> I think `with-no-warnings' and `(require 'starttls)' are unnecessary.
KY> For `with-no-warnings', it binds `byte-compile-warnings' to nil
KY> when compiling.  It is for making the byte compiler silent on any
KY> form, however there seems nothing to be warned when compiling.
KY> In addition, `with-no-warnings' is not available in Emacs 21 and
KY> XEmacs that Gnus supports, so the warning like the following is
KY> issued when compiling Gnus:

KY> While compiling the end of the data in file gnus/lisp/starttls.el:
KY>   ** The function `with-no-warnings' is not known to be defined.

KY> It is not serious since the function will not be used with those
KY> versions of Emacsen, though.

OK.  This was in the original code in smtpmail.el, I just moved it out
to starttls.el where it was more appropriate.

KY> For `(require 'starttls)', the reason I say it is unnecessary is
KY> that the function is defined in starttls.el that provides the
KY> `starttls' feature. ;-)  Therefore the function can be rewritten
KY> like the following, isn't it?
KY> (defun starttls-any-program-available ()
KY>   (let ((program (if starttls-use-gnutls
KY> 		     starttls-gnutls-program
KY> 		   starttls-program)))
KY>     (condition-case ()
KY> 	(progn
KY> 	  (call-process program)
KY> 	  program)
KY>       (error (progn
KY> 	       (message "No STARTTLS program was available (tried '%s')"
KY> 			program)
KY> 	       nil)))))

Yes, that's better, thanks.  I wasn't paying attention when I copied the
code.  Comitted.

Ted