From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36319 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Epprecht Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: [repost:] orphan scoring Date: 22 May 2001 22:35:53 +0200 Message-ID: <86g0dx3yvq.fsf@i2d.home> References: <86eltpadd0.fsf@i2d.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171924 7960 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:45:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 18009 invoked by alias); 22 May 2001 20:37:07 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 18002 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 20:37:04 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.sunweb.ch (212.90.199.3) by gnus.org with SMTP; 22 May 2001 20:37:04 -0000 Original-Received: from i2d.home [212.90.194.47] by mail.sunweb.ch with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.05) id ADCF1E44028A; Tue, 22 May 2001 22:36:31 +0200 Original-Received: from dada by i2d.home with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 152Isk-000049-00; Tue, 22 May 2001 22:35:54 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <86eltpadd0.fsf@i2d.home> (Robert Epprecht's message of "16 May 2001 10:48:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 16 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36319 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36319 Please excuse if I repost my question, I'm just curious: Am I doing something wrong or stupid, is it only me, or is it a bug? If I put the following line (and nothing else) in a score file ((orphan -500)) orphan scoring does not happen for me in current CVS Gnus. As soon as there is another scoring rule in the same score file orphans are scored down like expected. I'm seeing this using the agent (set up to use 'normal' scoring rules) but also in plugged state (which bypasses the agent if I understand that right), so I don't think it's an Agent thing. What's wrong? Robert Epprecht