From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16032
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Not a timetable
Date: 13 Aug 1998 15:42:38 -0500
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <86g1f0pq9t.fsf@kramer.bp.aventail.com>
References: <m3u33h6cwu.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <x7r9ykaea2.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <m367fw8y9p.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <76zpd8tyrl.fsf@ppllc.com>
Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035154968 25455 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:02:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:02:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA16050
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 1998 13:51:56 -0700
Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA32405
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 1998 16:45:46 -0400
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAT10292; Thu, 13 Aug 1998 15:16:35 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 13 Aug 1998 15:42:20 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA15350 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 13 Aug 1998 15:42:08 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from slow.in.aventail.com (vina14.cntwk.net [207.205.120.140])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA19256
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 1998 16:41:55 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from kramer.bp.aventail.com (kramer.bp.aventail.com [192.168.2.2])
	by slow.in.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA23396;
	Thu, 13 Aug 1998 12:41:59 -0700
Original-Received: (from wmperry@localhost)
	by kramer.bp.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA04758;
	Thu, 13 Aug 1998 15:42:38 -0500
Original-To: Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com>
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;
In-Reply-To: Jake Colman's message of "13 Aug 1998 16:25:34 -0400"
Original-Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.8/XEmacs 21.0 - "Thuringian"
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16032
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16032

Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com> writes:

> >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> 
>    Lars> Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:
>    >> That is a shame.  Regardless of FSF Emacs 20.3's usability, it will still
>    >> have MULE.  That, in and of itself, is a big reason why many will not be
>    >> downgrading from 19.34.
> 
> Doesn't 20.3 make MULE optional?

  Not really.  It supposedly has the --unibyte flag.  But it is still a
little weird even with that.

-Bill P.