From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87814 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: tricky explicit interactive verbosity Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:16:24 +0100 Message-ID: <86h8tw1uqv.fsf@zoho.com> References: <86inef4cmf.fsf@zoho.com> <877eusu8xi.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510690642 3970 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2017 20:17:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:17:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m36028@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 14 21:17:17 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.35]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhe0-0000XQ-Cs for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:17:16 +0100 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id d11ef2a0-c978-11e7-8154-b499baabecb2; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhdO-0001wY-Mj; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:16:38 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhdM-0001vv-4L for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:16:36 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhdK-0006PC-Kk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:16:35 -0600 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhdJ-0008MW-7N for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:16:33 +0100 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhd9-0006Kw-P4 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:16:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:6Ux81JMd9mSThGj9WVS4Cw6DPdA= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87814 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > It doesn't look like > `gnus-summary-current-score' is used > programmatically at all, so I'm not sure why > it would need to use gnus-message in the > first place. Other code can (and does) use > whichever of `gnus-summary-article-score' or > `gnus-thread-total-score' is necessary. > > I'd be in favor of just using `message'. This brings to mind something I've thought about, namely how does Gnus development work? Should one submit patches thru some formal procedure with the hope it gets accepted, or report it as a bug, or just mention it here? This particular issue could be a good exercise because it is so trivial and harmless to begin with :) -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573