From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84263 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Was the davmail fix synced to emacs bzr? Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:16:17 +0100 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <86ha7crary.fsf@dod.no> References: <87zjnb8nqx.fsf@dod.no> <87ob392mus.fsf@dod.no> <87bnyumhyv.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87y51xrwzl.fsf@dod.no> <87ppn9dt0a.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87txclrpbo.fsf@dod.no> <87y51x819b.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87ppn8skg4.fsf@dod.no> <87k3dgmwtq.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87d2j8qbw1.fsf@dod.no> <86r46zp5zd.fsf_-_@dod.no> <87eh2gvisb.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394028995 686 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2014 14:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32511@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Mar 05 15:16:42 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WLCck-0002P6-9u for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:16:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WLCcg-0003YN-W1; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:16:39 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WLCcf-0003YC-Td for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:16:37 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WLCcb-0007nU-UB for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:16:37 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WLCca-0004nW-1N for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:16:32 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WLCcY-0002DI-Fs for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:16:30 +0100 Original-Received: from 138.124.80.132 ([138.124.80.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:16:30 +0100 Original-Received: from sb by 138.124.80.132 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:16:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.124.80.132 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fgtvyMzUbiYuntfUGSZmBmdF79U= X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-392--3218h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-279--2294h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-279--2294h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-70--574h-0s--0d--H*r:Debian, 0.000-65--529h-0s--0d--HX-Complaints-To:sk:usenet@ Spam tokens: 0.993-15919--687h-60916s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.992-21097--976h-80970s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.992-21940--1032h-84271s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.990-21728--1245h-84272s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.990-21728--1245h-84272s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.7 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84263 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen : > Steinar Bang writes: >> Did the davmail fix make it into emacs bzr? > Yes, it's in bzr Emacs, too. Thanks! Do you know if it will be part of the next released Emacs? (whatever version that is?)