From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66471 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: encrypt.el Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:06:26 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <86hcfesjnx.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <874petkgw8.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <868x41jj51.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86r6hkq60k.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8663w9p1ug.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205161617 21435 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2008 15:06:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:06:57 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14961@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Mar 10 16:07:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYjZM-0004Bs-HY for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:05:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JYjYa-0000SN-HX; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:04:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JYjYY-0000S2-Jw for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:04:50 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYjYR-0008E7-2D for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:04:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.blockstar.com ([170.224.69.95]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JYjYX-0004cR-00 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:04:49 +0100 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com (unknown [38.98.147.130]) by mail.blockstar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8D33E8092 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:07:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:080310:ding@gnus.org::HOYCOY7NViVTftGX:00002DyD In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:28:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66471 Archived-At: On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:28:38 +0100 Reiner Steib wrote: RS> On Thu, Feb 28 2008, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> I'll adjust the netrc.el code so it doesn't reference encrypt.el >> anymore, and uses EasyPG to load the same files. >> >> The only downside is that uses must install EasyPG to get those >> features, until it's part of Emacs (I don't know when that will happen, >> maybe after the next release?) RS> It is already in Emacs CVS. But it won't appear in Emacs 22.*. I RS> don't know about XEmacs. Hm, I wonder if I should leave encrypt.el hooks in netrc.el or remove them. If I remove them, Emacs 22 users will have to get EasyPG and enable epa-file-mode on their own to encrypt their authinfo/netrc files. I could put up a warning if I detect encrypt-* variables after encrypt.el is remove, but that's annoying and about as much work as keeping encrypt.el around. I was hoping to remove encrypt.el altogether but am not sure after thinking about it. Does anyone have an opinion? Ted