From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20303 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME handling for common MS Windows attachments? Date: 14 Jan 1999 15:10:07 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <86hfttd3a8.fsf@kramer.bp.aventail.com> References: <13980.49570.552112.474836@amenardo.corpemea.baynetworks.com> Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158617 17013 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:03:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA15468 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:09:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB00367; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:09:09 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:09:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA17213 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:09:09 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from slow.bp.aventail.com (usrpri2-64.kiva.net [206.97.75.129]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA15436 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:09:00 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from kramer.bp.aventail.com (kramer.bp.aventail.com [192.168.2.2]) by slow.bp.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA02955 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:09:02 -0800 Original-Received: (from wmperry@localhost) by kramer.bp.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA07214; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:10:07 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7 writes: > Robert Bihlmeyer writes: > > > But to think of the security-cheese that most M$ apps are (e.g. you > > can exec arbitrary commands from excel)... > > Indeed. Whether displaying it automatically or not -- doing things > that are known to be dangerous without warning gives me a bad vibe. > > Most of the other viewers are "harmless" -- xv is unlikely to execute > parts of the data contained in pictures. The Microsoft "viewers" are all > infamous for executing whatever you throw at them. So then I assume we pass -dSAFER to ghostview or ghostscript? Wouldn't want a postscript attachment deleting, renaming, or overwriting files. :) I know XV does this by default when viewing postscript files. -Bill P.