From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67821 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: unmarking in *Dead Summary* forgotten Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:25:26 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <86iqqbd8ft.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <874p1xdmrl.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87ljv8jy72.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227634068 19478 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2008 17:27:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:27:48 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16268@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 25 18:28:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L51iU-0007oC-RG for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:28:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L51gM-0006Zu-Vj; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:26:39 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L51gL-0006Zi-Bu for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:26:37 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L51gJ-0008Ct-7C for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:26:37 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1L51gR-0002Sn-00 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:26:43 +0100 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L51gE-0008GM-RW for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:26:31 +0000 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:26:30 +0000 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:26:30 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rlAnUORo7EgPgr5g923fjPlEyDk= X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:67821 Archived-At: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:12:33 +0800 jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: RS> If it's supposed to be a "normal summary buffer", unmarking after RS> waking up a dead summary buffer should work. j> Many of the Dead Summary operations work as documented. Except the one j> I reported in this thread. I understand now, I have read the Gnus manual and never noticed this feature. I thought you were going to a summary buffer that was not useful at all. Sorry. j> That is extra bad because the user already has learned to trust the j> Dead Summary operations, as the others work. Only later, if he is j> lucky, does he discover that his unmarking was thrown away. Agreed. But I know nothing about this code or the feature, so I hope someone else is interested in fixing it. Ted