From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/88455 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Define groups of recipients Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:59:41 +0100 Message-ID: <86k1gvhjqa.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87bm2c5jzc.fsf@web.de> <874l84199z.fsf@enricoschumann.net> <87ef78qh12.fsf@web.de> <87tvg17juf.fsf@web.de> <878sxd7j2r.fsf@uwo.ca> <87zhpsqg1j.fsf@web.de> <87ef742jf1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="18013"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M36660@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 19 00:01:04 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h61Fc-0004RG-UE for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:01:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1h61Ex-0005m4-5e; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:00:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1h61Eo-0005g9-De for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1h61El-0007u4-LL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h61Ei-0007tt-Fh for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:05 +0100 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h61Eg-0003Qv-FA for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZYZy/Bu8axEVX8VYpj217f/D4hw= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:88455 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > It's also very much not the way that Emacs > completion is meant to work, though. I don't > hold out much hope that it could be changed > (as you note, it's been like this a long > time), but for EBDB at least I've had to jump > through a lot of hoops to get completion > to work. It works great with ~/.mailrc! What's to change? Unnecessary work with zero or close to zero gain, the risk of introducing bugs, incompatibility issues, people's own little hacks gets screwed, and so on. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573