Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lantz moore <lmoore@contigo.com>
Subject: Re: pgnus-0.77 bug in forwarding mime messages
Date: 26 Feb 1999 10:52:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86n221c817.fsf@godzilla.contigo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "26 Feb 1999 08:49:38 +0100"


>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

Lars> lantz moore <lantzm@contigo.com> writes:
>> then i forwarded said message to myself.  the resulting message didn't
>> turn out quite like i expected.  neither gnus nor metamail could
>> decipher the mime components of the original message.  all the '=' in
>> the original message were encoded to =3D (which seems resonable, i
>> guess).

Lars> Hm.  Sounds like something qp-encododed the message.  Did the
Lars> headers say something about Content-Transfer-Encoding or the like?

the headers on the part are:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

mm-encode.el is definitely qp-encododing the message/rfc822 part on
purpose.

from mm-encode.el
(defvar mm-content-transfer-encoding-defaults
  '(("text/.*" quoted-printable)
    ("message/rfc822" quoted-printable)
    ("application/emacs-lisp" 8bit)
    ("application/x-patch" 8bit)
    (".*" base64))
  "Alist of regexps that match MIME types and their encodings.")

i changed the message/rfc822 from quoted-printable to 8bit in the alist
and forwarded the message to myself again.  using 8bit, things worked like
you would think that they would, ie, both gnus and metamail were able to
render the message.  but i still don't see what problem the
quoted-printable content-transfer-encoding is causing.

you should be able to reproduce this yourself by sending yourself a gif
and then forwarding that message back to yourself...  (pgnus-0.77).

on a somewhat related point, why do we need to qp-encode text/.* and
message/rfc822?  shouldn't we really only have to quote an occurance of
the boundary in the message text (which is quite unlikey anyway)?  just
curious.

-l



  reply	other threads:[~1999-02-26 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-02-23  1:45 lantz moore
1999-02-26  7:49 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-02-26 18:52   ` lantz moore [this message]
1999-02-26 22:39     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86n221c817.fsf@godzilla.contigo.com \
    --to=lmoore@contigo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).