From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67557 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap article editing Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:04:35 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <86od1tr3ng.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <86bpxtsx1k.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8763o1d620.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223579147 9789 80.91.229.12 (9 Oct 2008 19:05:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:05:47 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16008@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Oct 09 21:06:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ko0q9-00062R-Uo for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:06:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ko0oa-0006GH-6f; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:04:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ko0oY-0006G2-T2 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:04:46 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ko0oW-0001ut-9O for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:04:46 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ko0ob-0007Ze-00 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:04:49 +0200 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ko0oT-0006sD-E6 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:04:41 +0000 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:04:41 +0000 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:04:41 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z9OEchs46quJ2mEmdrGAW4Y86yQ= X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:67557 Archived-At: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:36:23 +0200 Reiner Steib wrote: RS> On Thu, Oct 09 2008, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> The new one should have the same Message-ID but otherwise >> can be completely different. It doesn't even need the same Message-ID, >> it can be treated as a followup if that breaks any functionality. RS> Creating a new Message-ID would break threading. The edited article RS> should have the same Message-ID, as we do for nnml, etc. Do you know of anything that would break if two messages have the same Message-ID? I don't, so I agree with you that we should stick with the same Message-ID, but my point was that if there is such functionality that depends on unique Message-IDs we will have to fix it or change the Message-ID of the new message. Ted