From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66271 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problems with gnus-registry Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:43:34 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <86odasai1l.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <76sl0vma5q.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86k5loxulw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76tzkoq1t4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x20wi2a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y7a0nyo3.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86lk60uwwq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <764pconmz4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86abmfv3ig.fsf@lifelogs.com> <767ihjm5qn.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86myqfoxrv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y79zkpnx.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x1yp3lr.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202399007 12100 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2008 15:43:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:43:27 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14762@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Feb 07 16:43:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JN8ui-0001C9-Qs for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:43:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JN8tY-00066F-Ek; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:42:36 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JN8tW-00065v-T6 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:42:34 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JN8tQ-0003Fa-Lo for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:42:34 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.blockstar.com ([170.224.69.95]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JN8tT-0004Vc-00 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:42:32 +0100 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com (unknown [38.98.147.130]) by mail.blockstar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0273F8E2B for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:17:52 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:080207:ding@gnus.org::WHX1wZTsScKZepig:0000Ghqr In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:05:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66271 Archived-At: On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:05:26 +0100 Reiner Steib wrote: RS> On Wed, Feb 06 2008, Ted Zlatanov wrote: RS> [ gnus-registry-ignored-groups ] >> Sorry, I gave you the wrong variable name. This is the right one with >> the default value: >> >> (setq gnus-registry-unfollowed-groups >> '("delayed$" "drafts$" "queue$" "INBOX$")) RS> IMHO, something with "-ignore-"/"-ignored-" would be a better name for RS> consistency with many other Gnus variable including RS> `nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent-ignore-groups' and RS> `nnmail-cache-ignore-groups'. There's two variables: (in gnus.el) ;; The Gnus registry's ignored groups (gnus-define-group-parameter registry-ignore :type list :function-document "Whether this group should be ignored by the registry." :variable gnus-registry-ignored-groups :variable-default nil :variable-document "*Groups in which the registry should be turned off." :variable-group gnus-registry :variable-type '(repeat (list (regexp :tag "Group Name Regular Expression") (boolean :tag "Ignored"))) :parameter-type '(boolean :tag "Group Ignored by the Registry") :parameter-document "Whether the Gnus Registry should ignore this group.") (in gnus-registry.el) (defcustom gnus-registry-unfollowed-groups '("delayed$" "drafts$" "queue$" "INBOX$") "List of groups that gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent won't return. The group names are matched, they don't have to be fully qualified. This parameter tells the Registry 'never split a message into a group that matches one of these, regardless of references.'" :group 'gnus-registry :type '(repeat regexp)) They are used differently. Ignored groups are not saved in the registry, but they are followed for splitting (this is incorrect, I think). Unfollowed groups are not followed by gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent function but they are saved. I think the two should be united in one variable, specifically gnus-registry-ignored-groups since it's more powerful and should do the same thing. I'm not sure why I didn't do it so far. Is it OK to make that change? I'll deprecate gnus-registry-unfollowed-groups, emit a message when it's set, but still respect it as equivalent to gnus-registry-ignored-groups. Ted