From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22348 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: comments on pgnus-v0.80 Date: 08 Apr 1999 09:25:34 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <86ogkz195t.fsf@kramer.bp.aventail.com> References: Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160285 28872 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:31:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA15077 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 10:25:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB14474; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 09:24:51 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 08 Apr 1999 09:25:20 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA00535 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 09:25:05 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from slow.bp.aventail.com (usrpri2-3.kiva.net [206.97.75.68]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA15072 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 10:24:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from kramer.aventail.com (kramer.bp.aventail.com [192.168.2.2]) by slow.bp.aventail.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA09081; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 10:23:36 -0700 Original-Received: (from wmperry@localhost) by kramer.aventail.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA02954; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 09:25:34 -0500 Original-To: "Rupa Schomaker (list)" X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7 writes: > SL Baur writes: > > > Per Abrahamsen writes in ding@gnus.org: > > > > > SL Baur writes: > > >> * Notwithstanding the previous item and the coolness of Lars' > > >> presentation, I'm not sure I like handing html parts to W3 as a > > >> default. It was pretty cool that tm blanked it out -- html > > >> doesn't belong in either mail or news. How fast does this all > > >> work on slow(er) machines? W3 flies on Demeter, but that's not > > >> exactly a fair test yet. > > > > > I don't even notice that some articles are in HTML rather than plain > > > text. This is on a 166 Mhz UltraSPARC. I don't think you can buy > > > PC's slower than that today. > > > > O.K. Fair enough. Objection dropped. > > > Where W3 really breaks on my machine is on the only piece of HTML email > that I actually read. It is about 60K and is a multi-level table. > Rendering it takes about 30s - 1min on my PPro 200. Very slow. Regular > "HTML Email" that most people generate renders immediately. I think that > tables just take forever to render... Tables are very slow.... if anyone wants to volunteer to rewrite the rendering of them, feel free. :) -bp