From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62530 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfram Fenske Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: moved messages don't go away neither Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:50:52 +0200 Message-ID: <86psjv52tf.fsf@student.uni-magdeburg.de> References: <87wte5mqzw.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <86vetox1lo.fsf@student.uni-magdeburg.de> <87k6a4qn0c.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <867j64nkte.fsf@student.uni-magdeburg.de> <871wwcdm0x.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144259700 19767 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2006 17:55:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 17:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m11057@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Apr 05 19:54:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRCDB-00072Q-SK for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:54:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FRCD5-0005pX-00; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:54:27 -0500 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FRC9t-0005pR-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FRC9p-0006IU-Dc for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.uni-magdeburg.de ([141.44.1.10]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FRC9o-0007jn-00 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:51:04 +0200 Original-Received: from sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de ([141.44.8.7]) by mail.uni-magdeburg.de with esmtp (EXIM Version 4.43) id 1FRC9k-0001n0-5N; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:51:03 +0200 Original-Received: from hondo (pD95161BD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.97.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k35HovTH004662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Apr 2006 19:50:59 +0200 Original-To: Uwe Brauer In-Reply-To: <871wwcdm0x.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:28:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (berkeley-unix) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: ---- Start SpamAssassin results -2.6 points, 5.0 required; -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-Scan-Signature: 2f255716d114fd33a6975e7c663eba49 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62530 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer writes: > [...] > > Wolfram> Did you recompile "nnimap.el" or move the old "nnimap.elc" > Wolfram> out of the way? IIRC, Emacs tries to use the compiled > Wolfram> version of a file, even if it's older. > > Of course I did. Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. > Wolfram> Also, how exactly are you're articles still there? I > Wolfram> ask, because there are two problems: > > [...] > > Wolfram> 2. Moving articles in the nnimap backend didn't work > Wolfram> because the article in the source folder was not > Wolfram> expired. But in contrast to problem no. 1, the article > Wolfram> in the source folder could still be read. My patch > Wolfram> should have fixed this bug. > > But the article has been copied? If so then it is my case. Yes, that's the one I meant. > I use the gnus-summary-move-article function, say in a imap folder > INBOX, then the articles *gets* copied to the new imap folder, say > IMPORTANT, and the article is then *marked* as deleted. However when > I reenter the group INBOX, the article is still there. Weird. This should be working now. It is for me and at least one more person [1] (not much, I know ;-)). I just checked again, explicitly saying "M-x gnus-summary-move-article" -- everything OK. I have no clue why it doesn't work in your Gnus :-/ Regards Wolfram Footnotes: [1] -- A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?