From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: split-fancy and gnus-registry confusion
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:19:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86r6eq9zl6.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2lk4ytnr8.fsf@nwalsh.com> (Norman Walsh's message of "Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:14:35 -0500")
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:14:35 -0500 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
NW> / Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> was heard to say:
NW> | Are you sure you got nothing? If so, then `B t' may not have called
NW> | gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent. Try running it manually:
NW> |
NW> | M-: (gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent)
NW> |
NW> | in the article buffer with the headers visible (hit `t').
NW> It reports "nil" but gives no other debugging messages. 'B t' still
NW> reports "misc" which is (still) wrong.
Set gnus-verbose to 9.
Run both commands.
Look in the *Messages* buffer for the debug output.
Thanks
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-21 17:09 Norman Walsh
2008-02-27 22:40 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-02-28 14:09 ` Jake Colman
2008-02-28 14:32 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-02-28 14:36 ` gnus-registry logging and splitting improvements (was: split-fancy and gnus-registry confusion) Ted Zlatanov
2008-02-28 14:38 ` split-fancy and gnus-registry confusion Ted Zlatanov
2008-03-03 16:07 ` Norman Walsh
2008-03-03 21:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-03-04 17:14 ` Norman Walsh
2008-03-04 17:19 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2008-03-04 21:14 ` Norman Walsh
2008-03-04 21:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-03-05 12:49 ` Norman Walsh
2008-03-05 13:04 ` Norman Walsh
2008-03-05 19:05 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-03-05 19:03 ` Ted Zlatanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86r6eq9zl6.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=ndw@nwalsh.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).