From: Wolfram Fenske <Wolfram.Fenske@Student.Uni-Magdeburg.DE>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: epg and expired recipient keys
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:41:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86r6s2zp3d.fsf@hondo.cadr.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4modn7q9jr.fsf@jpl.org> (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:29:28 +0900")
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
>>>>>> In <867itvcdve.fsf@hondo.cadr.de> Wolfram Fenske wrote:
>
>> How about a version that uses the "dolist" macro? I think this makes
>> the code a lot clearer. Plus, it's shorter.
[...]
> I mean dolist is generally slower than well-designed while loop.
> For instance:
[...] (while version snipped)
> 0.5125889778137207
> 0.5080130100250244
> 0.5140340328216553
> 0.5127580165863037
> 0.5110170841217041
[...] (dolist version snipped)
> 0.6363399028778076
> 0.6323390007019043
> 0.6358840465545654
> 0.6289501190185547
> 0.6397740840911865
Interesting.
> I used Lars' benchmark.el[1] and XEmacs 21.4.20 for those tests.
>
> [1] http://quimby.gnus.org/elisp/benchmark.el
Thanks. This might come in handy some day.
--
Wolfram Fenske
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-06 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-23 13:02 Michael Piotrowski
2007-02-24 16:00 ` Werner Koch
2007-02-26 10:37 ` Michael Piotrowski
[not found] ` <smutzxbtsam.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu>
2007-02-26 12:23 ` Werner Koch
2007-02-26 12:49 ` Daiki Ueno
2007-02-26 14:31 ` Werner Koch
2007-02-27 11:23 ` Michael Piotrowski
2007-02-28 22:23 ` Daiki Ueno
2007-03-06 2:19 ` Wolfram Fenske
2007-03-06 4:29 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2007-03-06 9:41 ` Wolfram Fenske [this message]
2007-03-07 19:19 ` Miles Bader
2007-03-07 19:25 ` Miles Bader
2007-03-08 1:06 ` dolist vs. while-loop (was Re: epg and expired recipient keys) Katsumi Yamaoka
2007-03-08 14:55 ` Miles Bader
2007-03-06 4:40 ` epg and expired recipient keys Daiki Ueno
2007-03-06 9:37 ` Wolfram Fenske
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86r6s2zp3d.fsf@hondo.cadr.de \
--to=wolfram.fenske@student.uni-magdeburg.de \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).