From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64378 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfram Fenske Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: epg and expired recipient keys Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:41:10 +0100 Message-ID: <86r6s2zp3d.fsf@hondo.cadr.de> References: <87649ro899.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <87y7mlgl9f.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <56d409a7-d8c0-4e74-be44-824f942fd4e5@well-done.deisui.org> <87zm71f0sl.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <867itvcdve.fsf@hondo.cadr.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173174097 13109 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2007 09:41:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:41:37 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M12902@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 06 10:41:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HOWAf-0006Wf-R6 for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:41:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HOWAe-0005kY-6j; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:41:24 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HOWAc-0005kE-S9 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:41:22 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HOWAW-0006Le-AD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:41:22 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.uni-magdeburg.de ([141.44.1.10]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1HOWAV-0007YL-00 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:41:15 +0100 Original-Received: from sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de ([141.44.8.7]) by mail.uni-magdeburg.de with esmtp (EXIM Version 4.62) for id 1HOWAS-0004fF-HX; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:41:15 +0100 Original-Received: from hondo.cadr.de (pD9516314.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.99.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l269fBQP023305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:41:12 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:29:28 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix) X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-Spam-Report: ---- Start SpamAssassin results -3.9 points, 5.0 required; -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-Scan-Signature: a5b546456033b0c2695077fb2a7b3655 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64378 Archived-At: Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>>>>> In <867itvcdve.fsf@hondo.cadr.de> Wolfram Fenske wrote: > >> How about a version that uses the "dolist" macro? I think this makes >> the code a lot clearer. Plus, it's shorter. [...] > I mean dolist is generally slower than well-designed while loop. > For instance: [...] (while version snipped) > 0.5125889778137207 > 0.5080130100250244 > 0.5140340328216553 > 0.5127580165863037 > 0.5110170841217041 [...] (dolist version snipped) > 0.6363399028778076 > 0.6323390007019043 > 0.6358840465545654 > 0.6289501190185547 > 0.6397740840911865 Interesting. > I used Lars' benchmark.el[1] and XEmacs 21.4.20 for those tests. > > [1] http://quimby.gnus.org/elisp/benchmark.el Thanks. This might come in handy some day. -- Wolfram Fenske A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?