From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55202 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Duck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam-split doesn't split Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:16:30 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <86smjrl481.fsf@oumu.wohnheimb.uni-frankfurt.de> References: <86r7zdvp9d.fsf@oumu.wohnheimb.uni-frankfurt.de> <4nvfop39s9.fsf@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1071159443 6287 80.91.224.253 (11 Dec 2003 16:17:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3742@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Dec 11 17:17:19 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AUTV9-0002hx-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:17:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AUTUm-0000QV-00; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:16:56 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AUTUe-0000QP-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:16:48 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526CA3A0048 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:16:47 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AUTUc-0005Ps-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:16:46 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AUTUa-0005Pk-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:16:44 +0100 Original-Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AUTUa-0001bw-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:16:44 +0100 Original-Lines: 48 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 Cancel-Lock: sha1:vDO1kPznXJvJUKz7BPbWBmmYdLc= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55202 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55202 Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Tue, 09 Dec 2003, duck@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de wrote: > >> Hi all, >>=20 >> perhaps I'm a little to na=C3=AFve but the info says to do this: >>=20 >> (setq spam-use-bogofilter t) >> (require 'spam) >>=20 >> and then bogofilter should work. That's how I read it. Now, I have >> some spam, some ham, bogofilter dbs seem ok and I get some scores >> around 1 for spam. That's good. But spam-split doesn't move them. >>=20 >> `nnmail-split-fancy' is a variable declared in Lisp. >> -- loaded from "nnmail" >>=20 >> Value: (:spam-split) >>=20 >> looks OK to me but all the mails end up in the "bogus" folder.=20 > > You need to provide a fall-through, because spam-split will return > 'nil' if the mail is not spam. That's the first step. > Yes, I know. I just didn't want something else to interfere. >> Plus, if I M-x spam-split, nothing happens except "spam-split: >> calling the spam-check-bogofilter function". >>=20 >> What's wrong?=20 > > Turn up gnus-verbose to 10 and see if the messages are sensible. Test > a few messages manually with Bogofilter, through the > spam-bogofilter-score function, and see if they get scored properly. > Check the other items in the spam-bogofilter configuration group, > especially that the "bogofilter" executable is correctly found. That works. "spam-bogofilter-score" gives me the score - that's what I meant with "I get some scores around 1 for spam" - and gnus even feeds bogofilter with mails from the spam group (they get the spam-mark and my spamlist.db gets bigger and bigger :). But split-mail doesn't move spam to the spam folder in the first place. I have to do this by hand, which turns the whole classification concept useless somehow :). bye, Adam. P.S.: what happened to (spam-initialize) I see often in the archives?