From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81972 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Damon Haley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Respooing nnimap with nnmail-split-fancy Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:48:50 -0600 Message-ID: <86txy7xn65.fsf@colorado.edu> References: <868vfkz2b1.fsf@member.fsf.org> <8762aovxnu.fsf@xc.laptop> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340124996 7135 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2012 16:56:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:56:36 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M30242@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jun 19 18:56:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh1j4-0007v5-9X for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:56:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh1go-0002Jd-Mm; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh1c3-0002Hx-AL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh1bt-00019k-7k for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from ipmx3.colorado.edu ([128.138.128.233]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh1br-0006ke-In for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:48:55 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0EAMSs4E/AqBGb/2dsb2JhbABFtnKCGAEBBAFTKwsIAyENARcPAQQNT4d9AwYFC7AHDUqJBBSKOHYHgmABA4MbA4hDjXSJbYR+gn+BOQc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,799,1330930800"; d="scan'208";a="563815299" Original-Received: from omr-raz-2-priv.int.colorado.edu ([192.168.17.155]) by ipmx3-priv.int.colorado.edu with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2012 10:48:51 -0600 Original-Received: from innodev.colorado.edu (EHLO innodev) ([128.138.175.47]) by omr-raz-2-priv.int.colorado.edu (MOS 4.1.10-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DQK11975 (AUTH daha1836@colorado.edu); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:48:50 -0600 (MDT) X-Face: "'PJ-yb+fYF0]%?,#==_(s>`~Hw_iwG![Cc+Sq$k>S|QbU)>?}Y51$4)\9OEt:NL.@kZIqy .L<,Nd[nsMwrN3b]os1UqBw X-Accept-Language: en-us X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <8762aovxnu.fsf@xc.laptop> (XeCycle@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:32:53 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81972 Archived-At: XeCycle writes: > Damon Haley writes: > >> Hi, I split IMAP mail happily using the following setting, which works >> well. >> >> (setq nnimap-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy) > > See (info "(gnus) Splitting in IMAP"), and search for `fancy' > there. The variable is nnimap-split-rule for me. Hmm, it looks like the same issue I am experiencing was documented here (unresolved): http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74703 I can't see to get rid of this message when trying to repool IMAP articles, even when gnus-summary-respool-query is working fine. Here's the error I get: "gnus-summary-respool-article: No method given for respooling Here are my relevant settings: (setq nnimap-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy) (setq gnus-select-method '(nnimap "pu" (nnimap-address "exchange.pu.edu") (nnimap-stream ssl) (nnimap-server-port 993) (nnimap-authenticator login) (nnir-search-engine imap) (nnimap-expunge-on-close never) (nnimap-split-methods default) (nnimap-inbox "INBOX"))) It looks like the select method for nnimap is defined as this: ("nnimap" post-mail address prompt-address physical-address respool server-marks) Is there a way to make it stop prompting for a physical-address and just do the right thing like mmnl does? I'm not good enough with elisp to debug this all the way right now, but may have more time later. It does look like a bug to me. Let me know if I should file it as one. Any help appreciated. Thanks, Damon