From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66440 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: split-fancy and gnus-registry confusion Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:05:39 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <86tzjl6lfg.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <86abllp2nd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86mypfbixg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86r6eq9zl6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86fxv69o83.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204789232 1188 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2008 07:40:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Norman Walsh Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14921@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Mar 06 08:40:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXAid-0001CI-Hd for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 08:40:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JXAfX-0006Rl-B0; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:37:35 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JWyuL-00030F-SF for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:04:05 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JWyuF-0000qw-S2 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:04:05 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.blockstar.com ([170.224.69.95]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JWyuM-0002yb-00 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:04:06 +0100 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com (unknown [38.98.147.130]) by mail.blockstar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C473E3E8085; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:05:38 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:080305:ding@gnus.org::3oYrsr0F5Pvcvl9O:00002Iwo X-Hashcash: 1:20:080305:ndw@nwalsh.com::FzDK1yRENybEVUBi:0006j/C In-Reply-To: (Norman Walsh's message of "Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:04:41 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66440 Archived-At: On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:04:41 -0500 Norman Walsh wrote: NW> / Norman Walsh was heard to say: NW> | I have no idea how/why it traced to nnml:misc. NW> | It isn't there, it wasn't sent from there, and it's never been there. Here NW> | are the headers for it: NW> [...] NW> | Curiously, if I look in .gnus.registry.eld, sure enough I find: NW> | NW> | ("" ((mtime 18380 22548 203572)) "w3c.member.tag" "nnml:misc") NW> | NW> | So now I guess the question is, who decided to put nnml:misc in there? NW> And the answer to that question is, because this split rule didn't match: NW> ("sender" "^tag-request@w3.org" "w3c.member.tag") NW> I took the "^" out, moved it down a little bit in the list, and now the NW> right thing happens. And I think this resolves the mystery of how *my NW> original* got misfiled. And that, in turn, resolves the mystery of why NW> the parents were wrong. NW> So it was user error after all. But we knew that already, right? :-) It was good that the debugging info helped you. Because the registry is so thorough about catching articles, these problems will happen so I'm glad new users of the registry will not suffer like you and Jake Colman did :) Ted