From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66318 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: registry subject tracking problem Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:19:15 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <86tzka3rcs.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <76prv7v394.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203106703 12553 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2008 20:18:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Jake Colman Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14809@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Feb 15 21:18:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQ713-00058I-Ti for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:18:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ70X-0001yN-4g; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:18:05 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ70V-0001xy-ID for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:18:03 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ70P-0006zh-7R for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:18:03 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.blockstar.com ([170.224.69.95]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JQ70T-0004tP-00 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:18:01 +0100 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com (unknown [38.98.147.130]) by mail.blockstar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341853F8E4B; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:54:39 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:080215:colman@ppllc.com::Glk1msFJm0aXpGzI:01LAr X-Hashcash: 1:20:080215:ding@gnus.org::/Lrx8VqvdxJ7v9tv:00006ipX In-Reply-To: <76prv7v394.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> (Jake Colman's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:09:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66318 Archived-At: On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:09:43 -0500 Jake Colman wrote: Jake> The initial message's headers are as follows: Jake> Subject: Build Issue with XRT Licensing Jake> I find the following entry is .gnus.registry.eld: Jake> ("<76zluc8sqv.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com>" ((mtime 18347 34824 532917) (sender . "Jake Colman ") (subject . "Build Issue with XRT Licensing")) "INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues") Jake> The email sent in reply, has the following headers: Jake> Subject: RE: Build Issue with XRT Licensing Jake> I manually moved this email where I had hoped the registry would file Jake> it. I now find the following entry in .gnus.registry.eld (which, Jake> incidentally, appears earlier in the list than the first one): Jake> ("<0B72769B5EA61E45BFDAB9B849923FE703359C09@hamilton.ppllc.com>" ((mtime 18348 30274 550938) (sender . "Mark Vosteen ") (subject . "Build Issue with XRT Licensing")) "INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues") Jake> The problem is that if I execute (message-fetch-field "subject") on Jake> these two messages, I get different results. Jake> For the first message I get: Jake> "Build Issue with XRT Licensing" Jake> For the second message I get: Jake> "RE: Build Issue with XRT Licensing, Build Issue with XRT Licensing" Strange, I get only the original subject (with RE:, but that's removed in the registry by gnus-simplify-subject). I don't know why the subject is not retrieved properly from the second e-mail. You must have called message-fetch-field in a strange context. In any case, note that the subject was extracted properly for the second message since the registry entry has the right subject. So from now on, messages with that subject should go to "INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues". Can you grep the registry file for "Build Issue with XRT Licensing" and see if it shows up in any other groups? That would be a reason why the followup didn't go to the right place. I'll do the logging improvements we discussed earlier. Sorry for the delay, but I've been too busy with a new baby :) Ted