From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/88520 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: authentication method fails Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:44:09 +0200 Message-ID: <86v9z3dw8m.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <86r29wm8md.fsf@zoho.eu> <87sgu8y1bv.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <865zr4gxo5.fsf@zoho.eu> <87tvenrz03.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="222934"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M36723@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Apr 24 21:44:55 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hJNp8-000vo9-4L for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:44:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hJNom-0002lD-HU; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hJNoe-0002fi-U7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:44:24 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hJNoc-0005g4-I3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:44:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hJNoY-0004jf-Kh for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:44:21 +0200 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hJNoW-000uyn-EF for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:44:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:gm8SFlUB1AAtYJqajCTYSwtXTY4= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:88520 Archived-At: Florian Weimer wrote: > Wasn't the message injected over Gmane, > via NNTP? OK, see your point. >> I set the SMTP port >> (`smtpmail-smtp-service') to 587 witch is >> the one for starttls, if that's what >> you mean? > > There are no Received: headers in your > message which indicate how authentication was > performed, if it was even submitted > over SMTP. > > It's common to use network boundary > authentication for SMTP, so on some networks, > no configuration is necessary to use the > smarthosts for that network. The 1&1 mail > servers are not in this category, at least > not for customers on external networks. OK, I CC this to him, perhaps this is the reason. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573