From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62512 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfram Fenske Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: moved messages don't go away neither Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:17:23 +0200 Message-ID: <86vetox1lo.fsf@student.uni-magdeburg.de> References: <87wte5mqzw.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144200097 13864 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2006 01:21:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 01:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m11039@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Apr 05 03:21:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQwi6-0000D3-Gj for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:21:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FQwhx-0003wV-00; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FQweS-0003wP-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:17:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FQweQ-00022j-Bg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:17:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.uni-magdeburg.de ([141.44.1.10]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FQweP-0002Xm-00 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:17:37 +0200 Original-Received: from sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de ([141.44.8.7]) by mail.uni-magdeburg.de with esmtp (EXIM Version 4.43) for id 1FQweI-0007mP-Em; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:17:37 +0200 Original-Received: from hondo (pD9515F87.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.95.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by sunny.urz.uni-magdeburg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k351HSTH029142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 03:17:29 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Dave Goldberg's message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2006 18:09:01 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (berkeley-unix) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: ---- Start SpamAssassin results -2.6 points, 5.0 required; -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-Scan-Signature: 813ca537f141dd5e570ef4519bd8bf1f X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62512 Archived-At: Dave Goldberg writes: > I used to see that. A couple months ago someone provided a patch > that has been incorporated in No Gnus that appears to have solved it > for me. That was me ;-) and I used to have the problem of "ghost mail," too. But when I saw this thread I checked again, and it seems I don't have it anymore. Thinking about it, it makes a little sense (but not a whole lot): without the patch, when nnimap moved an email, it created a copy in the destination folder (like it was supposed to), but didn't switch back to the source folder before setting the `Deleted' flag, which had the effect that the mail in the source folder never got expired. My guess is that this threw off the agent; at least it's easy to imagine how this would cause cache inconsistencies of some sort. Anyway, it seems I don't have the problem anymore and I'd suggest to try and see if my patch [1] keeps it from re-occurring. Any non-existent mail you have now, you have to get rid off by hand, though. Regards Wolfram Footnotes: [1] -- A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?