From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53335 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Epprecht Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nntp articles wrongly marked as read ('O') Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 21:16:49 +0200 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <86vfugain2.fsf@i3d.home> References: <86el2t3heb.fsf@i3d.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1057437207 13329 80.91.224.249 (5 Jul 2003 20:33:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 20:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1879@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Jul 05 22:33:25 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Ytin-0003Sl-00 for ; Sat, 05 Jul 2003 22:33:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19YthU-0001M8-00; Sat, 05 Jul 2003 15:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19YthM-0001M0-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 05 Jul 2003 15:31:56 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 30838 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2003 20:31:55 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 30833 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2003 20:31:55 -0000 Original-Received: from mail01.solnet.ch (212.101.4.135) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 5 Jul 2003 20:31:55 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA7162298 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 20:31:50 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail01.solnet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06851-06 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 20:31:49 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from i3d.home (adsl-212-41-72-51.solnet.ch [212.41.72.51]) by mail01.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954B362276 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 20:31:46 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from dada by i3d.home with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19YsWf-0000Cu-00; Sat, 05 Jul 2003 21:16:49 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Karl Eichwalder's message of "Wed, 02 Jul 2003 20:38:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by SolNet Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53335 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53335 Karl Eichwalder writes: > Robert Epprecht writes: >> [ ... ] I still see occasionally some messages marked as read >> (*and* unseen!) in *nnml* groups. >> The messages have just been split by nnmail-split-methods and when >> I enter the group some messages show up as read. >> The agent is *not* involved, [...] > I can confirm this behavior. It often seems to happen if you receive > an answer to within a thread where the old messages were already > intentionally marked as read _and_ when there is an unrelated but more > recent message ticked. That's possible, but I'm quite sure that I have seen it with messages *not* belonging to a thread. On the other hand we once had (in an earlier discussion about it) the impression, that *moving* (other) messages from (or maybe also into) the group could be involved. In all the cases I have seen in between, this seems possible, but I do not really know yet... >> It is an old and *very* annoying bug. I still have no clue what triggers >> it. > Yes, that's the problem. [...] Robert Epprecht