From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66309 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problems with gnus-registry Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:51:29 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <86wsp777fi.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <76sl0vma5q.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86k5loxulw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76tzkoq1t4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x20wi2a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y7a0nyo3.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86lk60uwwq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <764pconmz4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86abmfv3ig.fsf@lifelogs.com> <767ihjm5qn.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86myqfoxrv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y79zkpnx.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x1yp3lr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86odasai1l.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203011441 31532 80.91.229.12 (14 Feb 2008 17:50:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: David Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14800@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Feb 14 18:51:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JPiEe-0007OV-NA for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:51:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JPiDz-0001xm-EW; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:50:19 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JPiDy-0001xT-7R for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:50:18 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JPiDs-0006X5-4E for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:50:18 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.blockstar.com ([170.224.69.95]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JPiDw-0005cz-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:50:16 +0100 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com (unknown [38.98.147.130]) by mail.blockstar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C7E3F8E49; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:26:44 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:080214:de_bb@arcor.de::LtCiuVCR6Tu+XMa5:0002e0I X-Hashcash: 1:20:080214:ding@gnus.org::UawYSDO11EAdr2YC:00003u6d In-Reply-To: (David's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:58:17 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66309 Archived-At: On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:58:17 +0100 David wrote: D> Reiner Steib writes: >> As we want to store marks (or "labels") in the registry, wouldn't it >> make sense to have two different variables? (Though both should/could >> contain "ignore" in the name, like the related nnmail-* variables.) A >> user might want to ignore some groups for parent splitting, but want >> to set marks in these groups. D> I second that, please keep both variables. But I think it should be made D> clearer that the variable currently named D> gnus-registry-unfollowed-groups is related to splitting only, so maybe D> call it gnus-registry-split-with-parent-ignored-groups or something like D> that. I'd like to avoid the two variables, see my proposal separately. If you and Reiner feel strongly they should be separate, though, I'll go along. D> By the way, I'm currently playing around with the registry labels and D> was wondering: what would currently be the best way to get all message D> ids with a certain label? This way, I could easily create nnmairix D> groups containing only these messages. Currently there's no reverse mapping. We have it for subject and sender, and it should be fairly easy to generalize it for multi-value entries like the labels. See gnus-registry-fetch-extra-entry for the cache insertion part; gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent uses the cache. I think the code could be much better, BTW. Ted