From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10780 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: url-insert-file-contents Date: 22 Apr 1997 10:36:53 -0700 Sender: wmperry@kramer.in.aventail.com Message-ID: <86wwpv6jt6.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com> References: <86pvvnds5o.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com> <199704221620.MAA15871@uh-oh.chapelhill.hp.com> Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150593 26347 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:49:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA17469 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 10:56:46 -0700 Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 19:37:03 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7535 invoked by uid 504); 22 Apr 1997 17:34:43 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 7532 invoked from network); 22 Apr 1997 17:34:42 -0000 Original-Received: from newman.aventail.com (HELO newman) (root@199.238.236.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 1997 17:34:42 -0000 Original-Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer [192.168.1.12]) by newman (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA11763; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 09:03:53 -0700 Original-To: Tony Bennett Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7 writes: > William> url-insert-file-contents has not changed in ages. It has always > William> returned: > > William> (kill-buffer url-working-buffer) > > William> docs for kill-buffer say: > William> Value is t if the buffer is actually killed, nil if user says no. > > My XEmacs 19.15 kill-buffer returns nil on success. But I just noticed > it has following note in docstring, so gnuserv is overriding at least > some its behavior: > > NOTE: This function has been enhanced to allow for remote editing > in the following way: > > ... The correc thing to do is not rely on the return value of url-insert-file-contents. I did not intend for there to be any semantics for its return value at all. -Bill P.