From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32216 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francisco Solsona Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Losing dormant marks in nnimap groups Date: 15 Aug 2000 12:43:35 -0500 Organization: Universidad Nacional =?iso-8859-1?q?Aut=F3noma_de_M=E9xico?= Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <86zomefmig.fsf@beta.fciencias.unam.mx> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168522 18474 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:48:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946A0D051E for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 13:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAC06662; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:50:16 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:49:33 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA04691 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:49:23 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from beta.fciencias.unam.mx (beta.fciencias.unam.mx [132.248.195.38]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B41DD051E for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 13:49:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 22035 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Aug 2000 17:53:08 -0000 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: Ding list In-Reply-To: John S Cooper's message of "15 Aug 2000 16:03:59 +0100" X-Home-Page: http://beta.fciencias.unam.mx/solsona/ X-Face: "e<&PCSuDeI>Wnz0s(fk:UP((Y'&0**fKwX:LL\,e"-5AS4+1|fdTE!(r,"&eLI}x(aQy-j M(jT(KvDbG@:bC<#KFDy}}*'Y8V7@DGOy39Ze@8P@tN)a%m/+'#Z?[+V&XUibbO writes: > However, if I leave the group and then reenter, the article is now shown with > the "old" O mark, i.e., the ? mark is lost. I do not see this problem with > ticked articles. > > I do use auto-expiry (and wonder if this might be causing problems?) Same happens here, and I use nnml and total-expire, so no, I don't think is auto-expiry related. I tried tracing the code from `gnus-summary-exit' on, and unfortunately I couldn't find where the problem lies, the group info is updated correctly, so maybe in the last face (when the file is written) dormant marks are lost. :-( I added `gnus-summary-save-newsrc' to my `gnus-summary-exit-hook' a few weeks ago, and I noticed this problem last week, so this might be related, but I don't have time to test this right now, anyone? -- Francisco