From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 13094 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2023 03:26:38 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 28 Oct 2023 03:26:38 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwZy2-007CWV-1K for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:26:34 -0500 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwZy1-000SCc-2I for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:26:29 -0500 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwCez-000QL4-1L for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 21:33:17 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwCeu-006Xul-1t for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 21:33:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References :Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ab9qqQh2OtXkEMhG3ecEM3EFgRoniLx9b36z2AiaZ3s=; b=b4lKO7Xs6R60h6KjpNJ+/YXXqQ idbwAgewe8MxNJ8U7j5RxPgYD0ZxAJR7OdHogj89qVvTF9O79fj/KH2XS6NcXkTo4dwdiXk3VmOy9 nJ2TYK7cLx//1FvI69dA48VOYTquWpFh0DyqFMG0S/fiFoDbsMOsgph4j2zxT41wnRKg=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qwCem-0005Ik-Lg for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:33:07 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qwCej-0001gB-QC for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:33:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ding@gnus.org From: Pankaj Jangid Subject: Re: Gnus threads too many articles together Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:02:51 +0530 Message-ID: <871qdgiylo.fsf@codeisgreat.org> References: <878r7r15h5.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:k4lQZwrxL6P8wXTmpTBaWkbaMgs= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Eric S Fraga writes: > Check out gnus-thread-ignore-subject; setting this to t should do what > you want. That's interesting. I was relying only on 'gnus-summary-thread-gathering-function' and 'gnus-thread-sort-functions' only. But the docstring of 'gnus-thread-ignore-subject' says this, Threads that are split because the subject changes will still be sorted as if they were part of the same thread, and ‘gnus-thread-sort-functions’ will not apply to these split threads. Thanks for sharing this.